The 2024 Election: Student Opinions at St. Mark’s School

Dwight Lin ‘28

The 2024 presidential election already feels like it was ages ago, but it was held just earlier this month. The election featured Kamala Harris representing the Democratic Party and Donald Trump representing the GOP. Both candidates had previously held executive office, with Harris being the vice president from 2021-2024 and with Trump being president from 2017-2021. Trump was voted in as a huge upset in 2016, cracking the Democratic “blue wall” by winning the states of Pennsylvania, Michigan, and Wisconsin, as well as losing the overall popular vote by around 3 million votes.

In 2020, the Democratic party retook the White House, as their candidate Joe Biden regained Pennsylvania, Michigan, and Wisconsin, as well as the states of Arizona and Georgia. Joe Biden initially ran for reelection against Donald Trump but was forced to drop out of the race due to concerns about his age after the first presidential debate, with Vice President Harris taking over the campaign. The two were neck and neck in the polls until Election Day when Trump swept all seven swing states, won the popular vote for the first time, and took back the White House. He became the first president since Grover Cleveland to win two non-consecutive presidential terms.

St. Mark’s in particular had several strong opinions about the presidential election, as a student poll found that around 2/3 of the student body preferred Harris to Trump, with just over a quarter of the students preferring Trump. The most important issue for around 64.4% of students was abortion, a topic on which Democrats were highly rated compared to Republicans, particularly following the controversial repeal of Roe v. Wade in 2022. The second highest issue was the economy, with 56.4% of the student body considering it an important issue. In regards to the economy, Republicans polled significantly higher than Democrats nationally due to high levels of inflation under Joe Biden. Foreign policy, immigration, and gun rights all polled right around 44% each. Notably, 56.4% of respondents were women, who voted for Harris with a margin of around 8 points. Finally, around 63.4% of respondents identified as White. Trump won that vote by around 17 points, in stark contrast to the opinions of the school.

In conclusion, the school body favored Harris over Trump, which was supported by gender and their value on the importance of issues, while going against the general trend of white people favoring Trump over Harris.

Student Wellness in Seated Meal

Lily Oh ‘27

As St. Mark’s was initially established to foster rich elites in the United States, seated meals were designed to teach elites how to act properly in official dinners. Seated meals have remained a long-honored tradition in St. Mark’s from then, allowing students and faculties to bond and appreciate the community. However, the insufficient quantity of the food provided per table continues to be a recurring issue. Promoting sustainability by reducing food waste is important, but it should not take priority over community wellness. Students need to feel comfortable getting enough food to meet their nutritional needs during a seated meal. 

Far too often, tables run out of food before everyone has eaten enough, forcing students to search for food among other tables or walk back and forth to the server multiple times. This is especially frustrating for those seated in distant locations like Hinkle or the hallway as it disrupts the flow of conversation and true community bonding. Moreover, repeated trips to the kitchen could delay schedules like evening chapel or when running out of time, leaving students still feeling hungry even after dinner. Numerous students have been ordering food delivery to campus after seated dinner for additional food, proving that the food provided during the actual meal is not adequate enough. 

Last year, the school attempted to use an effective system to address food distribution: a color-coded table sign system. Tables displayed a green sign if they had food to share and a red sign if they needed more food. This system not only allowed food to be redistributed more efficiently before students made their trip back to the servery but also reduced food waste significantly as leftovers were not wasted. 

Seated meals are more than just eating; it is about creating a space for connection in our intentionally small community. As we continue to focus on sustainability, we should always remember that student wellness is equally critical. Starting from increasing the initial food amount served or reintroducing efficient systems like the color-coded signs, we should ensure everyone leaves the table feeling satisfied.

Exploring AI Use at St. Mark's: Student Perspectives and Experiences

Ian Cho ‘26

(Image generated using ChatGPT 4o with the prompt “create an image of students using AI tools in classrooms”)

Since the increased popularity of AI language models such as Open AI’s ChatGPT a few years ago, AI has permeated into our lives, especially in the classrooms. AI tools in education have the potential to revolutionize learning positively. However, careless AI usage without proper discourse can be detrimental to students’ learning. Amid the excitement and concerns surrounding AI in education, how are students currently using AI at St Mark’s? (The interviews are presented anonymously to ensure the authenticity of the responses and students’ privacy).

The usage of AI tools for assignments is highly prevalent throughout the community. AI language models have become the predominant search engine or source of information for some students. A student noted that contrary to her freshman year, “instead of searching on Google, I use ChatGPT first.” Another student commented that he “use[s] AI for [his] assignments, and among [his] friends, [he doesn’t] know anyone who doesn’t use AI in some shape or form.” The use of AI tools varies among the students. Some students use AI tools for brainstorming ideas, summarizing texts, or having the AI language models act as tutors. Most students revealed that they use AI tools to study for tests. Students were generally impressed by the AI tool’s ability to synthesize and summarize the key concepts. When AI tools are used after a conversation and confirmation with a teacher and used without hindering a student’s independent thinking, it can significantly increase the efficiency of the student by eliminating tedious tasks. 

However, other students admitted to using AI in less responsible ways, such as having AI language models write significant portions of assignments. Some students expressed frustration for the unaccountable use of AI tools in classrooms: “I don’t use AI, or at least I don’t have AI write my essays for me, but I see other students in my classes having AI write their essays for them… and they get better grades than me.” Therefore, many face a dilemma where their responsible use of AI tools puts them at a disadvantage over students who may be academically dishonest; the current landscape and environment around AI tools essentially punish students for maintaining academic integrity in certain classes. 

The consequences of the AI tools are also demonstrated by students’ learning experiences when excessively using AI tools: “I don’t think anymore. I feel like I just go to ChatGPT for help all the time.” Since AI language models such as Open AI’s ChatGPT can generate responses to questions immediately, students are often stripped of the thought processes that facilitate learning, understanding, and improvement. Other students voiced similar experiences. A student revealed that “because I use ChatGPT so much, it leads to a lack of confidence, and I always worry whether I used AI too much or if I did not use AI enough.” Because the student had developed a habit of always having AI tools to assist in assignments, the student did not feel confident and comfortable completing specific tasks without AI. Students are also confused regarding the boundary between academic dishonesty and leveraging AI tools to enhance learning. Furthermore, students noted that they were unsure how to cite AI usage. 

When asked about the effect AI had on classroom interactions, a student replied, “I don’t really ask questions to my teachers anymore because I have gotten so used to having ChatGPT teach me… it’s just quicker and easier.” The statement significantly deviates from “St. Mark’s mission to St. Mark’s remains committed to prioritizing human inquiry and relationships” (Guidelines for Students: Artificial Intelligence in Academics (24-25)). The lack of communication between students and faculty is also highlighted in students’ reluctance to talk to teachers about using AI for assignments. Students gave examples of times they asked teachers whether they could use AI to create images for a mascot or AI voiceovers for a video project. Students also expressed interest in the AI image-generating assignment for the Survey of Literary Genres last year. On the other hand, when it came to AI use in writing assignments, students revealed that they were less willing to ask the teachers. Students attributed the reluctance to the preconception that teachers believe using AI is immoral: “I feel like teachers have the stereotype that AI provides incorrect information.” Other students simply refrain from communicating with teachers despite knowing that their use of AI is irresponsible because AI can save them time. The current use of AI significantly deviates from St. Mark’s Guidelines for Students: Artificial Intelligence in Academics, which encourages students to ask teachers questions and set common boundaries for AI use, as each teacher and class has different expectations and tolerance for AI use. 

A student described St. Mark’s current AI policy statement as a “strong policy” but added, “We are lagging behind in acting on it and actually addressing how important AI is to our future.” The majority of the students interviewed were not even aware that there was an AI student policy statement or had never read it. 

On April 19th, 2024 (AI Literacy Day), St. Mark’s hosted a symposium on Artificial Intelligence in Education: New Trends in Teaching and Learning. The symposium provoked discussion between faculty from various schools and departments on ensuring AI literacy and the responsible use of AI in classrooms. Dr. Russo shared, "We have to talk about [AI in education]… This is a conversation that is so much bigger. It really will change the landscape of teaching and learning.” “Academia tends to lag behind these innovations,” added Mr. Spalletta. “Let’s get ahead of it!”

The current student use of AI tools and adherence to the AI policy statement begs the need for further discourse. Faculty should be proactive in facilitating discourse on properly using AI tools in a class, such as by introducing and demonstrating the proper use of AI tools to the students. Students should recognize the consequences of using AI tools irresponsibly and reach out to teachers when unsure whether AI is allowed. The rapid advancement of AI presents many opportunities when used responsibly, but it also presents various challenges that may significantly hinder learning. Students and faculty must constantly communicate to ensure that students at St. Mark’s can leverage AI tools effectively and responsibly to lead lives of consequences. 

Candle Lighting and Eucharist Services

Feifei Cao ‘27

(The candles and lighter at the Candle-Lighting Service on Wednesday)

There is an email sent to the St. Mark’s community every Wednesday, floating to the top of inboxes and most likely being left on read indefinitely. The cycle lapses like this: a familiar subject line, a click, and a quick skim before returning to the blur of daily life.

But this email is more than a subject line in an inbox—it is an encouragement to pause. The email invites St. Markers to a place on campus where most typically only visit two times a week, at 8 in the morning. However, every Wednesday at 1:20 p.m., Belmont Chapel transforms into a haven of tranquility, offering a moment of calm amid the hectic life at St. Mark’s: a candle-lighting service. Whether you stay and light a candle for a few minutes or linger longer, the time is yours to reflect, pray, or simply be still.

As Rev Solter’s invitation gently reminds us, “You’re welcome to come and go as your schedule allows.” For a few minutes, anyone is able to light a candle, offering a moment of warmth and introspection. The simplistic process of the ritual allows for self-reflection and the creation of a calming ambiance, inspiring inner hopes and other quiet moments of gratitude.

Additionally, a short Eucharist service follows the candle lighting, providing an opportunity to connect with others and the sacred space of Belmont Chapel. Through shared prayer and quiet observation, this communal experience reiterates to us the strength found in unity and reflection.


Perhaps this Wednesday’s candle-lighting email is worth more than a quick skim; it’s a chance to reconnect with yourself and the St. Mark’s community. It is an invitation to step away from the everyday rush of assignments and obligations, to hold a muti-purpose lighter and set aflame a small candle, allowing for reflection and finding quiet amidst business.  

Gray Colloquium: When Humor Crosses the Line

Seoyeon Kim ‘26

Photo of Melvin Adams presenting for Gray Colloquium

Read about another perspective here: First Gray Colloquium of the Year: Controversial Yet Captivating

Melvin Adams' visit to St. Mark’s left a lasting impression—but not always for the right reasons. While his upbeat energy and message about small acts of kindness resonated with some, his racially and sexually charged jokes came off as offensive and inappropriate for a school-wide audience.

One primary example of his offhanded racial jokes included when Adams referred to one of our student leaders, as "dark chocolate.” Adams proceeded to bring the leader on stage simply because, as Adams stated, this student is Black. Another statement had sexist undertones when he repeatedly told the girls not to think about their "hips and thighs," which ironically draws attention to the very things he claimed we shouldn’t focus on. This reaction is a classic example of ironic process theory—the more we try to suppress certain thoughts, the more prominent they become. Meanwhile, the message for the boys was simply about kindness and dreams. The stark contrast was unsettling, to say the least.

The subtly offensive comments didn’t stop there. In a class visit, he compared a student to Kim Kardashian, based on her hair and skin color—a comparison loaded with problematic implications given Kardashian’s sexualized media presence. He also made an insensitive joke to a student of Korean descent by saying "Saranghaeyo kimchi." Although that student didn’t seem deeply offended, the comment reinforces casual stereotypes that shouldn’t be normalized in a diverse community like ours.

What frustrates me most is that many students brushed off these remarks as harmless jokes. But humor like this, especially in a required school event, has a way of subtly reinforcing biases about race and gender. As one teacher pointed out, they'd likely be fired if a faculty member had made those same comments.

These ingrained stereotypes and microaggressions are the very issues we aim to diminish at St. Mark’s, and we should not passively accept such language. I do not intend to diminish those who enjoyed his humor, but rather, to encourage all of us to think more deeply about the messages we absorb, even when they seem harmless. We are taught to be conscious of what influences us and what tries to persuade us, whether with intention or without. We must be awake, walk the world with a critical lens, and challenge the ideas that don’t align with the values we uphold. Adams may not have intended harm, but intention doesn’t erase impact. St. Mark’s deserves speakers who can inspire all students—without resorting to offensive humor.

What New Students Are Saying About St. Mark's

Aiden Lee ‘28

Photo at the front area of St. Mark’s School, facing the new dorm.


With a month into the fall term, new St. Mark’s School students are beginning to find their rhythm as they navigate academics, extracurricular activities, and the community’s unique culture. As they continue to adjust to the school environment, many students are already sharing positive reflections about their experiences so far.

Several new students mentioned the welcoming atmosphere of the St. Mark’s community. Gianna Zhang, a third former, expressed, "Coming [to St. Mark’s] is very welcoming; people here are very nice. Classes are hard but still good." This sense of warmth and support is echoed by Melanie Elias, another third former, who shared, "My experience was very interesting. I was nervous at the start, but now I am getting better. And it was the best decision I had ever made." Another new student appreciated the close-knit environment at St Mark's. Chauncey Brown declared, “I'm settling in well at St. Mark's, and I like fitting in with everything. The classes aren't too hard either.” While getting used to a new community is not always easy, most students feel comfortable and are able to focus on making new connections and enjoying their time at school.

For some students, however, adjusting to academics was a challenge. Luke Aldershaw, a third-form transfer student, remarked that there was a “big difference” between his middle school and St. Mark's School. Now, classes are “an hour longer,” and “the homework is harder.” But, he still likes school very much. “So far, I'm really enjoying it,” he noted. Allegra Diodati, another third former, also commented on balancing her studies and school life: “Sometimes I have a lot of homework and sometimes I don't, but I really like it. It's pretty nice to get into a consistent routine.”

Many students use sports activities as a way to balance the demands of rigorous academic courses. Jeremy Ndegawa, for example, shared his enjoyment of sports at St. Mark's: “School is a bit tough and different but it's pretty good, and I love football practice. The experience here is different in a good way and the bonding is really good.”

Despite such difficulties, students appreciate the many opportunities at St Mark's. Whether it's sports, academics, or personal growth, incoming freshmen seem to feel the benefits of this community. Ethan Ng says, “I really like it here. I like everyone here. I like sports. I like academics. I like everything.” As the students continue their lives at Mark's, they will face many more challenges and successes, but one thing is clear: the warmth of the St. Mark's community and the support of their peers and faculty will guide them through whatever comes their way.

Reflecting on Community Day With Jason Craige Harris

Ian Cho ‘26

Photo from Community Day in the Class of ‘45 Hall

Community Day, formerly known as C&E Day, is an opportunity for members of the St. Mark’s community to gather and engage in workshops in order to foster understanding, empathy, and respect for our school’s diversity. The event is a crucial step to ensure an inclusive and equitable school culture. This year, the community gathered in the Class of ‘45 on September 14th with Jason Craige Harris, a researcher, educator, and strategist in community and equity. With his captivating eloquence and profound understanding of fostering learning environments, Harris inspired discussions between students and faculty on “How to Talk Across Differences.” 

Harris touched upon a variety of factors contributing to a successful dialogue across differences. He highlighted the importance of empathy: understanding and acknowledging what someone else may be going through. Harris revealed that people often make premature judgments about others without considering their perspectives. He also commented on recognizing the intent vs. impact of our words and actions, even when saying seemingly harmless jokes. After Harris’s initial keynote presentation, the students split up into their respective advisory groups to discuss questions relating to how the topics discussed in his talk can apply to the St. Mark’s community:

What can be challenging about dialogue? And how have you worked through those challenges?

In response to the first question, Ava Braccio ‘27, stated, “Being vulnerable can be hard when two people aren’t that close.” Nevertheless, she recommended that something as simple as “initiating conversations by saying ‘hi’ in the hallways” can overcome such challenges.

Vaughn Kim, ‘27, explained that dialogue can be difficult when you “don’t have a lot of commonalities with the other party”. However, he believed everyone could work through these challenges by “asking others about their days,” allowing people to have “deeper conversations across differences in the future.”

Where do we already have spaces for dialogue?

Elijah Abraham ‘26 highlighted the various affinity group meetings hosted throughout the school year as an exemplary space for conversations. In particular, he enjoyed the collaboration between the GSA (Gender and Sexuality Alliance) and CFG (Christian Fellowship Group), where students discussed common misconceptions about the relationship between Christianity and the LGBTQ+ community.

Why is dialogue integral to a healthy society?

Chloe Kim ‘26 explained that understanding is integral to a healthy society because “we want to make sure that everyone in our community feels respected and can thrive… Dialogue is a great way to communicate those needs.”

Overall, St. Mark’s is a diverse community with students from various cultural backgrounds; the 377 students from this school come from sixteen different countries meaning that everyone can have different experiences, interests, and perspectives. Thus, Community Day with Jason Craige Harris marked an incredible start to the year by encouraging students and faculty to foster a community built on empathy, equitability, and inclusivity, by understanding and talking across our differences. 

Religion at St. Marks

Andrew Lamprea ‘24

St Mark's School is a prime example of what a religiously affiliated institution like a boarding school should strive to be in today’s modern age. A far cry from the stereotypical oppressive religious boarding school, SM strives to promote the importance of personal choice, and the ideals of perennialism. This is all through the efforts of our religious faculty, namely Reverend Barbara Talcott and Reverend Katie Solter. Their openness to different perspectives and opinions in the classroom, as well as their enthusiasm when implementing religious aspects of different cultures in chapel services create a welcoming and warm environment for any budding theologian. 

Boarding schools, especially in the northeast, have a bad reputation when it comes to religious affiliation. Given their history of cruelly being used to convert indigenous people to speaking English and practicing christianity, this comes as no surprise. This reputation is broken however, when taking a look at cases of schools like St marks, which strive to open their students to as much religion as possible. In cases like our school, it is important to note the emphasis that to participate in the religious community is entirely up to personal choice, and that no one is forced to be a part of any denominational community. The chapel services are run in a way to allow any religion time to practice their own form of worship, as well as to emphasize the chapel as a platform to celebrate students and faculty first and foremost. Although episcopal thinkers are often more open to other religions in their own right, this very noticeable departure from a specifically christian atmosphere leads me to say that the label of  “episcopal” is a misleading nomer regarding the religious state of our school. 

Instead, if forced to give our religious community a label, I would call it a proponent of “perennialism”. Perennialism is the sect of philosophy which believes that there are bits of truth in all other sects of thought, and seeks foremost to teach its followers to think critically and open themselves to all forms of knowledge and philosophy. These ideals are clearly present in the St Marks community as shown in the course selection and the prayer selections for our chapel services. Not only is every student required to study all three of the abrahamic religions, but the religion department also offers courses suited for eastern religious thought, roman religious thought, celtic religious thought, and secular philosophy. Students who are interested in religion find this selection plentiful, filled with a wealth of knowledge to gain. It is hard to feel as though unique religious thinkers are stifled, as our clergy encourage and commend different cultural and religious prayers and traditions being brought into our inter-faith chapel. From a celebratory feast at the end of Ramadan, to a slew of hindu prayers and teachings being used as our readings during chapels, the school is sure to represent and embody the values of a global religious office. 

As someone who came to this school as a skeptical, judging atheist, I can say with certainty that my experience at this school has been nothing but positive. I was immensely worried that I would feel indoctrinated into the christian identity of the school, but instead, I was free to make my own judgments and come to my own conclusions about practices, cultures, and ideologies. It was this freedom that eventually led me back to finding my own faith, a journey best taken alone. Though I did have to come to religion on my own, St Mark's school was surely there for every part of my own personal journey to keep pushing me forward, and support me when I was lost. It is this support of universal knowledge and a championing of a variety of religions that separates St Marks from other religious institutions, and sets it as a shining example of what an institution such as this should strive to be.

C&E at St. Marks

by Andrew lamprea’24

The C&E Department at St. Marks has been a point of contention over the past couple of years. Some believe that the department is too pervasive in student life. Others believe the opposite, that the department does not do enough to be an effective body. The point of this article is to, objectively, give information regarding how some members of the student body feel about the department. The selection of students represents a multitude of St. Marks experiences, and gives a wide variety of backgrounds to hopefully reflect how different facets of the community think. This article should serve as well to give insight into the intersectionality of these sects of the student body, showing exactly where we agree and disagree on this topic. The selection includes Diane Kwon, a passionate liberal and one of the student leaders of SM Politics. Her repertoire of C&E experience includes being a former pathways prefect, and one of the most prominent speakers on politics in the current senior class. Ezio Salimbeni is another prominent figure in the political circles of the school, standing on the other side of the ideological spectrum from Diane. He is one of the current leaders of the conservative club. Brendan Kelly is a current pathways prefect, and represents the more moderate breed of liberal within the student body. They give a compelling insight into the student aspect of the C&E office, as they currently work with them. Finally, we have Jeamilett Martinez, an avid critic of some of the more unsavory aspects of the school community, and co-leader of the Native American affinity group. Additionally, Rick DaSilva gave a compelling recount of his experience as C&E head over the past year and a half, and what it has meant to him. Noticeably, all of these candidates are VIth formers, chosen because they have had around an equal amount of experience with the C&E office before and after its major changes in the past years. 

The questions I asked these students were as follows: What do you think is the biggest success of the C&E office? What about the biggest area for improvement? What, in your opinion, is the role of the C&E Department in the St. Marks Community? The students would have many different nuances to their answers, but also some common connections in their sentiments. 

What do you think is the biggest success of the C&E office? What about the biggest area for improvement?

According to Diane, the biggest successes of the C&E office have happened in years prior. She thinks that this year especially, there has been a noticeable lack of communication between the office, and the students who are in a position to help them. She hopes to see the office improve on this failing in the future.

Ezio states that he does not see the effects of the C&E office very much from his point of view. He said, “I cannot name a biggest success or area of improvement from the C&E office, because honestly, I don’t know any effects they've had on the community at all”. 

Countering Ezio’s criticism, Brendan explains that the biggest success of the department is normalizing having difficult discussions, and constructive discourse about current events that benefit any student who wants to learn. However, they also explain that “As an office, we are shooting too big right now. We need to stop treating symptoms, and start treating the roots of the issues we see here at the school.”

Jeamillett agrees with Ezio and Diane, saying that she wished the C&E department would address the actual issues in the school community. She thinks that the Office simply doesn't do enough to make an impact on student’s lives. She thinks they should have more community oriented events in the future. Her idea of a biggest success so far is the Wednesday morning talks done by Mr. DaSilva, though she notes that that policy does has some flaws.

What, in your opinion, is the role of the C&E Department in the St. Marks Community?

Diane thinks the C&E department should fit the role of a DEI (Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion) figure of authority within the community. She thinks that the office served more of a purpose in years prior when this was its priority, and thinks the office’s new priorities leave some members of the community who relied on that DEI role vulnerable and without a real voice in the community. 

Ezio sharply criticizes the C&E office and its role. He believes the C&E office serves a rather performative role. Its policies often do not accomplish a meaningful amount for the vast majority of the student body, but rather serve as bragging points for the school to say they are addressing the issues in the student body.

In contrast, Brendan believes that the C&E office should serve the role of educators for the student population. They would state that “I don't know how the rest of the school sees us, but I for one think we do serve that purpose”.

Similar to Brendan’s words about serving the community, Jeamilett believes the role of the office is to introduce communication and collaboration in the community, bringing the grades together. She thinks communication is the key to a healthy community. 

In addition to the student perspective, Rick DaSilva, our current C&E head was also interviewed. Mr. DaSilva thinks that the C&E office has gone through a number of necessary changes in the past year and a half, with the eventual goal of completely transforming the office from its role in years prior. In contrast to Diane’s opinion, he thinks the responsibilities inherent with his position in C&E are more than just maintaining a DEI(Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion)-type office. He thinks that the point of the office is to strengthen the school community, doing everything in its power to maintain the past traditions that give the school its individuality and character, while addressing some of the more distasteful aspects of our history in a healthy manner. While DEI is important in his eyes, it strengthens only some branches of the community rather than the greater student body. DaSilva also supports the doctrine of optional meetings, saying that he thinks making events mandatory only drives the students away from actually wanting to participate in an active SM community. When asked the prior of the two questions given to students, Mr. DaSilva had revealing answers. “I see every new student who shows up to one of these optional events as an individual success” he said. The ultimate success then, is the culmination of all of those students who choose to actively be a part of our school community. Every instance of a student choosing to go to an optional breakfast conversation (held almost every wednesday), instead of taking a sleep-in, is a major success on the part of the C&E office in his eyes. With aspirations of creating a tight-knit and connected community also come some inevitable issues. The biggest of these, in DaSilva’s eyes, is communication with the students and student leaders. “I have had multiple instances of students judging me and the office based only on rumors they heard from other students.” he claimed, illustrating the apparent disconnect between parts of the student body and the reformed office. 

These are but a few examples of different opinions, but they are varied enough to draw some conclusions from. First, there is a noticeable and undeniable lack of meaningful communication between the C&E office and its critics amongst the students. This has led to a number of misunderstandings and failings on both sides, and must be addressed no matter what direction the office goes towards in the future. Another conclusion that can be drawn from the polled opinions is that most students actively want to have those conversations about and with the office. There is definitely a desire on both sides to reconcile the differences within the school, and strengthen our community accordingly. There are issues, of course, with the current relationship between the department and population of the school, but these issues can be solved, and a solution is being worked towards. St. Mark’s is onto a good start, with both parties eager to talk to the other, and have meaningful discourses that will build our community into a stronger version of itself.